Advanced search
     

The differences in probe thinking between gifted and non-gifted students with learning disabilities

[Abstract] 
Type Article
Author Fakhrou, Abdulnaser A. M. Faculty of Education, Qatar University.
Second author Ahmed, Tarek Abd Almageid Kamel. Ministry of Education and Higher Education.
Pages pp. 1-12
Host Item Entry Educational Journal. no. 201, September 2021
Electronic Location Issue content (PDF)  PDF
Descriptors Comparative analysis  -  Thought processes  -  Academically gifted  -  Learning disabilities  -  Public schools
Language of document English
Country Qatar
The research aimed to study probe thinking among gifted and non-gifted male and female students with learning difficulties, as the probe thinking test was applied to a sample of 80 male and female students with learning difficulties from both boys and girls in government schools. And the research was carried out through an electronic test presented for teachers and parents, as the research results found that there are statistically significant differences between the gifted and the non-gifted with learning difficulties in favor of the gifted, and the research results showed that there are no differences between boys and girls in proactive thinking. And the research recommended attention to stimulating proactive thinking among students through teaching and classroom and extracurricular activities, the research also recommended discovering and developing students ’talents in a way that stimulates their proactive thinking and making use of that in treating learning difficulties and improving academic achievement. (Published abstract)

PermaLink  Permalink:

 Reference Management Software:

Refworks Export to Refworks

EndNote Export to EndNote


 Share through social media:




Cite   (APA) Style Always review your references for accuracy and make any necessary corrections before using:
Fakhrou, Abdulnaser A. M. (2021). The differences in probe thinking between gifted and non-gifted students with learning disabilities . Educational Journal. no. 201, September 2021. pp. 1-12 Retrieved from search.shamaa.org