شبكة المعلومات العربية التربوية

The current research aims to know (the impact of a specimen ideal in the development of analytical thinking among students in the fifth-grade literary history). To achieve the aim of the research, hypotheses formulated researcher zero the following: 1) there is no difference is statistically significant at the level of significance (0.05) between the average level students who experimental group studying material history of Europe and America modern and contemporary to conform to the form ideal and the average level students the control group who are studying the same article, the usual way to test the dimensional analytical thinking. 2) There is no difference is statistically significant at the level of significance (0.05) between the average scores of the experimental group students who were studying material history of Europe and America modern and contemporary to conform to the form in the two applications ideal pre and posttest analytical thinking. 3) There is no difference is statistically significant at the level of significance (0.05) between the average scores of the control group students who were studying material history of Europe and America modern and contemporary in the usual way in the two applications for pre and posttest analytical thinking. To achieve this, the researcher adopted the experimental design of the part-tuning two designs (experimental and control) and test analytical thinking. Applied research experience on a sample of students in the fifth grade in junior high moral guidance and the secondary vapor girls of the general directorate for educational Baghdad province for the academic year (2015-2016), which were selected from the Karkh schools Qsidia third tkavo researcher conducted between the two sets of search variables the following: (degrees history of the previous academic year 2014-2015, the IQ test, test tribal analytical thinking, academic achievement for parents) and using the chi square test and the test Altaia. And that the number of her students (70 students) by (35) student experimental group taught to conform to the form ideal, and (35) a student of the control group according to ordinary method. Independent equal to the number of samples found that there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in these variables at the level of significance (0.05). Having identified the researcher subject to be studied in the experiment, the first three chapters of the book of the history of Europe and America contemporary scheduled to be taught to students in the fifth grade literary academic year (2015-2016), drafted a researcher behavioral targets, the number is (121) target included six levels of classification bloom (bloom), (knowledge, comprehension, application, installation, analysis, evaluation), and then prepared lesson plans for the experimental and control groups, and offered a model of which a group of specialists to ensure their validity. Researcher experience at the beginning of the first semester began on Monday, 12-10- 2015, the researcher studied both groups on their own, at the end of the experiment test dish dimensional analytical thinking on the two sets of search on Thursday, 14-1-2016, it turned out as follows: 1) after the correct answers to students and using Altaia test for two independent samples of equal number show superiority of students in the experimental group to the control group in average test scores analytical thinking and thus rejects the hypothesis. 2) After finding the difference between the scores of students in the experimental group in the two applications for pre and posttest analytical thinking and using Altaia test of interrelated samples show that the result statistically significant for post-test and thus reject the null hypothesis. 3) After finding the difference between the scores of students in the control group two applications pre and post, and the use of Altaia test of interrelated two samples show that the result is not statistically significant. Accordingly, the researcher recommended the need to adopt a specimen ideal in teaching the history of Europe and America, modern and contemporary complementing aspects of current research suggested the researcher conducting a similar study in the subsidiary variables is analytical thinking and other study materials is history. (Published abstract)