Arab Educational Information Network

The study sought to compare performance of children with learning disabilities on the tests: standard Progressive matrices, and standard Progressive matrices Plus, the study sample consisted of (221) children ranging from 6 to 12 years, with an average age of (8.81) years and a standard deviation (1.58). Officially they were diagnosed as learning disabled at the programs of learning disabilities in primary school in Riyadh, during academic year 14361437-. The study used several statistical methods to answer the question of the study through a statistical program (IBM SPSS 19). Results revealed that standard Progressive matrices Plus is more difficult than the classic e standard Progressive matrices, While standard Progressive matrices clasic has best validity and reliability than standard Progressive matrices Plus. The study recommended the adoption of the classic e standard Progressive matrices for the Identification of learning disabilities, and expansion of the study is recommend on a sample of ordinary students and students with learning disabilities, using Raven CPM for comparison in the furure studies. (Published Abstract)