Refworks Format

A1 عيسى، إسماعيل أحمد سيد. A2 البرصان، إسماعيل سلامة A2 عطا الله، صلاح الدين فرح AB The study sought to compare performance of children with learning disabilities on the tests: standard Progressive matrices, and standard Progressive matrices Plus, the study sample consisted of (221) children ranging from 6 to 12 years, with an average age of (8.81) years and a standard deviation (1.58). Officially they were diagnosed as learning disabled at the programs of learning disabilities in primary school in Riyadh, during academic year 14361437-. The study used several statistical methods to answer the question of the study through a statistical program (IBM SPSS 19). Results revealed that standard Progressive matrices Plus is more difficult than the classic e standard Progressive matrices, While standard Progressive matrices clasic has best validity and reliability than standard Progressive matrices Plus. The study recommended the adoption of the classic e standard Progressive matrices for the Identification of learning disabilities, and expansion of the study is recommend on a sample of ordinary students and students with learning disabilities, using Raven CPM for comparison in the furure studies. (Published Abstract) http://search.shamaa.org/abstract_en.gif ID 124748 OP ص ص. 35-49 T1 أداء الأطفال ذوي صعوبات التعلم على اختبار المصفوفات المتتابعة المعياري واختبار المصفوفات المتتابعة المعيار المطور [مقال] UL 1 http://search.shamaa.org/fulltext.gif http://search.shamaa.org/PDF/Articles/KUJac/JacVol18No72Y2017/jac_2017-v18-n72_035-049.pdf النص الكامل (PDF)