شبكة المعلومات العربية التربوية

Aim of the research to detect the health of the following assumptions: hypothesis: 1) there are no statistically significant differences between the two groups differences (experimental and control) in the dimensional application of the test grades and dimensions to measure the cognitive dimension of the design and production of digital educational materials (skills designing educational presentations interactive media design skills-use production courses electronically programs) skills empty the impact of tribal application. The second hypothesis: there are no statistically significant differences in performance skills to members of the two groups differences (control and experimental) measured note card and dimensions (design skills, educational presentations and interactive-media design skills-skills courses electronically using production programs). The third hypothesis: there are no statistically significant differences in the growth of multiple intelligences differences (logical intelligence-linguistic intelligence-visual intelligence-intelligence musician-normal intelligence-intelligence-kinetic intelligence personal-social intelligence) between members of the two groups (control and experimental). to test the validity of this hypothesis was conducted researcher search experience on a sample of 80 student at the faculty of education, University of Qassim, were divided into two equal groups, the first officer is considering the selected unit in the traditional manner, and the second trial studying the selected unit using the integrated portal has been prepared by the researcher achievement test to measure side knowledge of the unit selected, has been applied to tribal, and Uday on members of the two groups (control group, experimental), also prepared a note card to measure the skill side of the skills of the design of digital educational materials form of: design presentations learning-skills of interactive media design skills-use production skills courses programs electronically, it was applied to the two groups. Use as intelligences scale (Midas) prepared (Charles Branton shearer) in 1994 and the (Rana Qoahh) in 2003, and exited the search results to prove the invalidity of hypotheses, where there are significant differences between the two groups (experimental and control) in the post application of the test grades may return to the impact of technological entrance complementary as evidenced by the analysis of the results that there are statistically significant differences in performance skills to members of the two groups differences (control and experimental) measured note card and components (skills designing educational presentations-interactive media design skills-use production courses programs electronically skills). For the experimental group, how also shows that there are significant differences in the growth of intelligences (motor, logical, visual, linguistic, social) when less than 0.05 for the experimental group level, while there was no statistically significant differences in the growth of intelligences differences (personal , natural), and then went out to search results emphasize the no validity of hypotheses all. (Published Abstract)