شبكة المعلومات العربية التربوية

The study aimed to identifying the performance measurement of sports leaders in decision-making in the sports activity department in Jordanian universities, and to identify the impact of the variable of scientific degrees on decision-making, Because of the importance of decision-making in the administrative process and its significant impact on the administrative performance of supervising leaders in universities. The study's questions focused on: What is the level of administrative performance of sports leaders in decision-making in sports activity department in Jordanian universities? What is the effect of the variable of scientific qualification on the level of decision-making among the sports leaders in the sports activity department in Jordanian universities? And What is the effect of the university variable (Jordanian, Yarmouk, Muta, Hashemite) on the level of decision-making among the sports leaders in the sports activity department in Jordanian universities. To achieve the goal of the study, the researcher developed a questionnaire with the help of experts in this field, and ensured its validity and reliability. The sample of the study was composed of (28) paragraphs. The sample consisted of (25) sports supervisors from four official Jordanian universities. For statistical treatment, The researcher used the descriptive approach means, percentages frequencies, standard deviation, (T) and the Cruschall test and Tyoki test to analyze the results. The results of the study showed that there are statistically significant differences in decision-making levels among sports supervisors in the sports activities department in Jordanian universities, Individual decision-making and irresponsibility, There are statistically significant differences in favor of the supervisors from the master's degree holders at the expense of the bachelor's degree. There are statistical differences between the universities in the decision- And in favor of the Hashemite University. The results also showed that the Jordanian government universities did not implement courses to improve the performance of employees and supervisors in the sports activity department, which is an important factor in influencing the positive sports decision taken. The study recommended to avoid individuality in decision-making, democratic and scientific principle should be used in decision-making, process of evaluation should not be limited to one person but through a specialized committee. And to ensure that personal relations are neutralized in the decision-making process and the process of evaluation should be through a specialized committee, And to ensure that personal relations are neutralized in the decision-making process. The study also recommended the establishment of development courses focusing on correct methods and methods of decision making, as well as taking care not to rely on personal relations in decision making, conducting similar studies on all Jordanian universities, and conducting a comparative study between government and private universities in the same subject. (Published Abstract)

L’étude faite vise à identifier la mesure de la performance des leaders sportifs dans la prise de décision dans les cercles d'activités sportives des universités jordaniennes ainsi que l'impact de la fluctuante prise de décision scientifique et universitaire dans les cercles d'activités sportives de ces universités. Afin de réaliser cela, un questionnaire comportant 28 paragraphes a été mis en œuvre ainsi qu'un échantillon de 25 superviseurs sportifs issus de quatre universités officielles: Jordanie, Hachemite, Yarmouk et Mu'tah. Le chercheur a utilisé dans son enquête l'approche descriptive ainsi que les moyennes arithmétiques, l'écart-type, les pourcentages, des tests tels que les tests de Crochet Walls et le test de Tookie. Les résultats de l'étude ont montré qu'il existait des différences statistiquement significatives dans les niveaux de prise de décision des superviseurs sportifs dans les cercles d'activités sportives des universités jordaniennes, avec une tendance à la décision individuelle et l'irresponsabilité ainsi que l'existence de différences statistiquement significatives en faveur des superviseurs ayant une maîtrise au détriment de ceux ayant un baccalauréat, et l'existence de différences statistiques dans le processus décisionnel entre les quatre universités au profit de l'Université Hachémite. À la lumière de cela, l'étude a mis l'accent sur la non-utilisation du principe individuel dans le processus décisionnel et l'utilisation du principe démocratique et scientifique, l'illimitation du processus d'évaluation dans les cercles d'activité sportive à une seule personne mais qu'elle soit faite à travers un comité spécialisé et assurer la neutralisation des relations personnelles dans le processus de prise des décisions. (Résumé publié)