اتخاذ القرار وعلاقته بالتوافق الاجتماعي لدى رؤساء الأقسام العلمية في الجامعة المستنصرية
Occupies the subject of social harmony vital place in the decision-making process because of its active role in the development and improvement of the administrative process paths. Therefore confirmed conferences and seminars hosted by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, and the official books that the reality of the decision making process at the heads of scientific departments in universities suffer a lot of problems and obstacles, in particular decision-making process, so it requires the decision maker to agree psychological and social continuously because it is exposed to many of the difficulties that occur in the work. The development of the third conference held in Iraq a year (1987) on the spread of weakness in the performance of some of the university educational leaders in the Arab countries, and called for the need to develop and strengthen the role of management and support requirements of the renewal and modernization and the emphasis on the leadership role of her. The head of the department they represent the university educational leadership, faced the problems and requirements and functions great, it appears that the efforts undertaken by the faculty members, and students belonging to the department. The process of managerial decision-making of the basic functions of the heads of science departments in the exercise of its powers and responsibilities, has pointed out many researchers to the seriousness of some of the variables on the decision-making process, and adds Simon (Simon, 1969) the importance of the environment surrounding the person taken to the decision and its impact on the environment of the Interior, such as information and perceptions the concepts and ideas in the social compatibility, and that the level of ambition and the expected value of rewards and continuous search for values and gains, as well as the social consensus of the people are the elements associated with Bmtakz decision. The problem with current research in answer the following questions: Is characterized by heads of departments of social scientific consensus? Will this affect the process of consensus decision-making? Does it differs according to the type and specialization? The current research seeks to verify the main objectives of the following: 1) Know the level of decision-making at the heads of scientific departments at the University of Mustansiriya. 2) You know the level of social consensus among the heads of academic departments in the University of Mustansiriya. 3) You know the relationship between decision-making and social consensus among the heads of scientific departments at the University of Mustansiriya. 4) know the differences in the relationship between decision-making and social harmony depending for: A) variable type (males females). B) specialization (scientific humanist). To achieve the above goals, the researcher adopting a measure of decision-making. The building measure social consensus, according to viewpoint Horney, as consisted of three areas: (compatibility of family, and compatibility to work, and compatibility with the community) Pttbaiqama the community was 86 Head of the Department selected the way stratified random from all the faculties of the University of Mustansiriya, equally distributed on according to variable type, specialty, and after the collection and processing of information and extract the psychometric properties of the indicators of reliability and validity, the use of statistical methods appropriate to achieve the objectives of his research with the assistance of the bag spss statistical results in the extraction and went out the results of the current research are: 1) The decision-maker is dealing with a huge amount of information, so it should be available has the ability to absorb and analyze information as well as take advantage of the base systems management information, if available. 2) The decision-making process is not art, but science also includes a set of stages and each stage is determined by a number of steps learned and trained by the head of the department in order to assist in making informed decisions. 3) The heads of academic departments, have a good consensus in males and females, and both scientific specialization and humanitarian law. It appeared that the arithmetic average of the sample grades greater than average premise of scale, which indicates that the heads of departments in the use of a consensual process of decision they make. 4) is characterized by the heads of academic departments and both types of specialization and strong decision-making, as it appeared that the arithmetic average of the scores is greater than the sample average premise of the scale, indicating that the heads of departments, they have a good ability to make decisions. 5) There are no differences in the relationship between decision-making and social harmony, according to the variable type (male - female) and specialization (Science - a human). (Published abstract)