Advanced search
     

Is inequitable teacher sorting on the rise? cross-national evidence from 20 years of TIMSS

[Abstract] 
Type Article
ISSN 21960739
information source ERIC
Author Glassow, Leah Natasha. Department of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Second author Jerrim, John. Department of Social Science, University College London Institute of Education, London, UK.
Pages 20 p.
General Note Peer reviewed
Source Large-scale Assessments in Education. Vol. 10, Article 6, 2022
Publisher New York: Springer، 2022
Publisher address Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600. New York, NY 10004. United States. Springer. T: 0018007774643 T: 0012124601500. F: 0012124601700. customerservice@springernature.com. https://link.springer.com/.
ERIC document no. EJ1341594
Electronic Location Full text (PDF)  PDF
Descriptors Developing countries  -  Achievement tests  -  Mathematics  -  International Assessment  -  Lower secondary education  -  Science tests  -  Access to education  -  Equal education  -  Teacher qualifications  -  Teacher effectiveness  -  Beginning teachers  -  Low income groups  -  Economic development  -  Tunisia
Language of document English
Country United States
Unequal access to qualified teachers for children of different socioeconomic status--also known as inequitable teacher sorting--has been increasingly put forth as one potential factor contributing to the socioeconomic achievement gap. Despite this, few studies have investigated cross-national differences in teacher sorting, and none have examined it within-countries over time. International large-scale assessments in education are uniquely positioned to answer such questions due to their longitudinal nature at the system level. This study uses six waves of data from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) from 1999 to 2019 for 32 education systems. We compare differences in grade 8 mathematics teacher qualifications for each country at each time point, across top and bottom groups on the student socioeconomic spectrum. Results show that on the whole many countries display negligible gaps in access to teacher quality, with some key exceptions. With respect to inequity in novice teacher sorting, the problem is most prevalent in low- and middle- income education systems (i.e. in Turkey, Morocco, Tunisia and Indonesia). Inequity in sorting based on mathematics education is less common, with no clear pattern in regards to level of economic development (i.e. in Chile, Australia, New Zealand, and Chinese Taipei). Socio-economic inequality in teacher sorting has also remained broadly stable over time. Based on experience and mathematics education, less than a handful of systems show systematic upward trends in teacher sorting inequity (i.e. in Chile, Morocco, Singapore, and New Zealand). Given the increasing focus on inequity in access to teacher competence, these results have economic and policy implications for tackling the socioeconomic achievement gap. (As Provided)

PermaLink  Permalink:

 Reference Management Software:

Refworks Export to Refworks

EndNote Export to EndNote


 Share through social media:




Cite   (APA) Style Always review your references for accuracy and make any necessary corrections before using:
Glassow, Leah Natasha. (2022). Is inequitable teacher sorting on the rise? cross-national evidence from 20 years of TIMSS. Large-scale Assessments in Education. Vol. 10, Article 6, 2022. 20 p. Retrieved from search.shamaa.org