Beyond Bias and subjectivity? Developing 16-19 year old students' understanding of historical interpretations through online inter-institutional discussion
[Abstract] | |
Type | Chapter |
Document no. | 14740 |
Author | Chapman, Arthur. Reader in Education, Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, United Kingdom |
Varying form of title |
أبعد من التحيز والذاتية :تطوير فهم التفسيرات التاريخية لدى طلبة الأعمار من 16 إلى 19 سنة من خلال المحادثة الإلكترونية بين المؤسسات [فصل] au-delà du biais et de la subjectivité? l'élaboration, chez des étudiants âgés de 16 à 19 ans, de l'assimilation d'interprétations historiques à travers des discussions interinstitutionnelles en ligne [Chapitre] |
Pages | pp. 53-84 |
Host Item Entry |
Learning and teaching history : lessons from and for Lebanon: Seventh Yearbook
|
Translation title | تشابمان، آرثر. أبعد من التحيز والذاتية : تطوير فهم التفسيرات التاريخية لدى طلبة الأعمار من 16 إلى 19 سنة من خلال المحادثة الإلكترونية بين المؤسسات. |
Electronic Location | Full text (PDF) |
Descriptors | History instruction - Teaching methods - Electronic learning - Secondary school students - Secondary education |
Language of document | English |
Country | Lebanon |
There is widespread agreement amongst history educators that history education should aim to help students understand and explore multiple perspectives on the past. However, as an important body of international research and theorizing indicates, understanding historical interpretations and accounts can present significant challenges for history students and, indeed, for adults. This paper draws on empirical, theoretical and pedagogic work and, in particular, on data sets developed through online discussion exercises involving 16-19 year old history students, academic historians and an history education academic in discussion about historical interpretations. The paper explores empirical questions about how these students appeared to conceptualize historical interpretations over the course of these discussion exercises and about the extent to which student thinking appeared to change, if at all, during the discussions. The paper also explores the impact that challenging questioning strategies and interaction with expert historical thinkers can have in moving student thinking on. (Author’s Abstract)
(APA) Style Always review your references for accuracy and make any necessary corrections before using: | |
Chapman, Arthur.. (2012). Beyond Bias and subjectivity? Developing 16-19 year old students' understanding of historical interpretations through online inter-institutional discussion . In Learning and teaching history : lessons from and for Lebanon: Seventh Yearbook. (pp. 53-84 ). Retrieved from search.shamaa.org |