العلاقة بين المرونة النفسية والتدفق النفسي لدى عينة من المراهقين في ضوء المشاركة في الأنشطة اللاصفية


Ar

The study aimed at finding out the relationship between psychological resilience and psychological flow of male and female adolescents according to their participation in extracurricular activities. The main sample consisted of 200 male and female students in general secondary school. The study used the psychological resilience scale (prepared by researcher)consisted of five-dimensions, emotional balance , self-efficacy, Social skills, patience and problem solving, and the psychological flow scale (prepared by Abdul Hadi Abdo and Farouk Othman (2018), which consisted of eleven dimensions the focus on the present moment, the integration of the act awareness, loss of awareness and the sense of control, control the important situations, loss of the sense of time , self-enjoyment where the activity and adequacy and immediate feedback and the sense of the ability to succeed in the task and the sense of experience in excess of any other requirements and clear objectives towards the direction of work and balance between the challenge and skill. The researcher reached several findings; the most important of which are : 1) The absence of statistically significant differences between the mean scores of males and females in the dimensions and the total score of the psychological resilience scale and the absence of statistically significant differences between the mean scores of males and females in the dimensions and the total score of the psychological flow scale as a whole, which proves verification of the first assumption. 2) The absence of statistically significant differences between the average scores of participants and non-participants in the dimensions and the overall degree of psychological resilience, except the dimension of the emotional equilibrium was statistically significant at the level of 0.01 for non-participants and there were no statistically significant differences between the average scores of participants and non-participants And the presence of statistically significant differences at the level of 0.01 in the total score of the psychological flow scale for non-participants. 3) There was direct relationship between the psychological resilience variable and the psychological flow variable at the level of significance (0.05). 4) The variable of psychological resilience can contribute to predicting the performance of students on the psychological flow scale. (Published abstract)