البحث المتقدم
     

Using different types of dictionaries for improving EFL reading comprehension and vocabulary learning

[Abstract] 
النوع مقال
ردمد 18324215
مصدر المعلومات ERIC
المؤلف Alharbi, Majed A. College of Languages and Translation, Riyadh, King Saud University
الصفحات pp. 123-149
ملاحظة عامة Peer reviewed
المصدر JALT CALL Journal. Vol. 12, no. 2, 2016
الناشر Tokyo: JALT CALL SIG، 2016
عنوان الناشر 1-6-1 Nishiwaseda Shinjuku-ku. Tokyo, 169-8050. Japan. JALT CALL SIG. . journal!jaltcall.org. http://journal.jaltcall.org.
ERIC رقم الوثيقة في EJ1112430
المصدر الالكتروني Full text (PDF)  PDF
الواصفات English  -  Second language instruction  -  Dictionaries  -  Vocabulary development  -  Reading development  -  Cognitive processes  -  Saudi Arabia
لغة الوثيقة الانكليزية
البلد اليابان
This study investigated the effects of monolingual book dictionaries, popup dictionaries, and type-in dictionaries on improving reading comprehension and vocabulary learning in an EFL program. An experimental design involving four groups and a post-test was chosen for the experiment: (1) pop-up dictionary (experimental group 1); (2) type-in dictionary (experimental group 2); (3) book dictionary (experimental group 3); and (4) no dictionary aid (control group). Following training on different types of paper and electronic dictionaries, posttests were given to the participants. Findings showed differential effects produced by the three treatments compared with the control group. Results indicated that the pop-up dictionary group had the shortest average vocabulary searching time, vocabulary and text reading time, and more "look-ups" (p<0.0001) than other dictionary groups. In addition, ANOVA analyses showed that text reading time was significantly longer for the book dictionary group. Reading comprehension and vocabulary learning were higher for the pop-up dictionary group than for other dictionary groups. Furthermore, survey data indicated that popup dictionary participants had slightly more positive attitudes toward dictionary use than the type-in group, and both had significantly more positive attitudes than book dictionary participants. Discussion of findings according to cognitive load theory followed, eventually leading to recommendations for teaching and research. (As Provided)

PermaLink  الرابط الثابت:

 برامج إدارة المراجع:

Refworks التصدير ل RefWorks

EndNote التصدير ل EndNote


 شارك من خلال وسائل التواصل الاجتماعية:




Cite   للمزيد من الدقة يرجى التأكد من أسلوب صياغة المرجع وإجراء التعديلات اللازمة قبل استخدام أسلوب (APA) :
Alharbi, Majed A.. (2016). Using different types of dictionaries for improving EFL reading comprehension and vocabulary learning . JALT CALL Journal. Vol. 12, no. 2, 2016. pp. 123-149 تم استرجاعه من search.shamaa.org .